Bitcoin presidents

[finaleshot2016]

I think being a pro-crypto and a politician will give you a spot in the government nowadays. I mean, we all want to make a country with good regulation on the crypto market, but sometimes it isn’t a good basis to vote. You really need to evaluate first if his/her environment is traditional or likely to pose a risk to Bitcoin too, because these kinds of claims that they will support crypto are not enough. Some politicians use crypto as a buzzword to gain attention without truly understanding or committing to its principles. It’s important to look at their past decisions, affiliations, and the actual structure behind their promises before putting trust in their leadership.

Also, sometimes crypto people just want a pro-crypto politician so they can benefit from it also but other sectors of the economy are forgotten.

[Zoomic]

I think that this is a testament to how much bitcoin has grown that not only your average citizens know and use bitcoin but also presidents. Bitcoin mass adaption might come a lot sooner than everyone initially thought.

Yea, Bitcoin has indeed grown so much that the fear of strict government regulations is gradually fading away. The political leaders coming in now seem to be more enlightened and more accommodating of the whole crypto idea, including the likes of Donald Trump, who was way too strict during his first tenure.

On second thought, their sudden interest brings me to ask: why the sudden interest by politicians, especially those seeking political positions during elections? Are they just being politicians who have found a better way to market themselves, knowing fully well that this is the new trend?

With their interest and involvement, I also show concern that these pro-Bitcoin presidents might try to make Bitcoin a bit centralized by introducing regulations that could give them partial control. There are both advantages and disadvantages to having pro-Bitcoin presidents.

[JiiBs]

Another thing is how presidents now use BTC for their campaigns, lol, it is not bad though, but it shows that BTC is becoming very very popular and crypto people now hold a large percentage of the population in many countries. It is an exciting and great time to be a bitcoiner with all of these developments happening.

That’s something I had hoped to highlight in this thread, politicians in nations around the world have seemingly come to the acknowledgment of the popularity of Bitcoin amongst youths as they constitute a larger population of adopters of Bitcoin or cryptocurrencies in our world. With the youths also making a large part of world’s population identifying with Bitcoin or cryptocurrencies in the campaigns simply means identifying with the youths and that could be all it takes to get some guarantee at the seat but, is that what we should be seeing from these guys… they seem to be using Bitcoiners or cryptocurrency enthusiasts real good in this way.

[Marvell1]

With their interest and involvement, I also show concern that these pro-Bitcoin presidents might try to make Bitcoin a bit centralized by introducing regulations that could give them partial control. There are both advantages and disadvantages to having pro-Bitcoin presidents.

That's the price we need to pay for bitcoin to become legitimate, more popular, and more valuable. Also, this is inevitable as they cannot ignore bitcoin and cryptocurrencies forever, while they are getting bigger and bigger. There will come a time when governments will also take an interest in bitcoin and intervene with regulations, laws...This world is theirs and nothing can escape them, bitcoin is no exception regardless of whether it is decentralized or not.

But we don't need to worry too much, as long as the bitcoin network remains decentralized, bitcoin will remain a decentralized asset, no matter how many regulations, or governments and organizations hold bitcoin.

[TheUltraElite]

More politicians are liking crypto so they'll make fresh laws which help ppl in their country use more crypto. It's going to be regulated but there's a new group of politicians who're saying they'll make crypto easy for ppl in their country.

More is not always good. I believe in quality over quantity first before increasing quantity.

So it would be a challenge over the years to see these politicians deliver promises - something that politicians have earned poor marks in over the last quite a few decades and thus I am skeptical but supportive of them.

If even a single politician does something revolutionary in crypto they will become an example that would be quality.

[arabspaceship123]

Less crypto happy politicians isn't good the more we've got it's better. If there's one or two crypto friendly politicians it doesn't help crypto's cause but if there's more politicians who promote crypto it's going to help.

More politicians are liking crypto so they'll make fresh laws which help ppl in their country use more crypto. It's going to be regulated but there's a new group of politicians who're saying they'll make crypto easy for ppl in their country.

More is not always good. I believe in quality over quantity first before increasing quantity.

So it would be a challenge over the years to see these politicians deliver promises - something that politicians have earned poor marks in over the last quite a few decades and thus I am skeptical but supportive of them.

If even a single politician does something revolutionary in crypto they will become an example that would be quality.

[Zoomic]

I think that this is a testament to how much bitcoin has grown that not only your average citizens know and use bitcoin but also presidents. Bitcoin mass adaption might come a lot sooner than everyone initially thought.

Yea, Bitcoin has indeed grown so much that the fear of strict government regulations is gradually fading away. The political leaders coming in now seem to be more enlightened and more accommodating of the whole crypto idea, including the likes of Donald Trump, who was way too strict during his first tenure.

On second thought, their sudden interest brings me to ask: why the sudden interest by politicians, especially those seeking political positions during elections? Are they just being politicians who have found a better way to market themselves, knowing fully well that this is the new trend?

With their interest and involvement, I also show concern that these pro-Bitcoin presidents might try to make Bitcoin a bit centralized by introducing regulations that could give them partial control. There are both advantages and disadvantages to having pro-Bitcoin presidents.

That's a fair point. There's no denying that Bitcoin's visibility has skyrocketed. The fact that even politicians are jumping on the crypto bandwagon speaks volumes. But it’s a bit fishy, right? Their sudden interest during election seasons raises eyebrows. Sounds like a marketing strategy to appeal to a younger and tech-savvy crowd.

While I appreciate that some leaders might actually understand crypto, we must remember that they also like to exert control. The last thing we need is more regulations that centralize Bitcoin. It's all about finding the balance. Maybe they're genuinely interested, or maybe they see an opportunity.

Whatever we are going to say now is mere assumption from our own end. We can only hope and pray that the policies these presidents who claim to be pro-Bitcoin will make are favourable to us all, as we cannot really do anything. Here we are still observing Trump's tenure and how it has affected the market over the past few months since he was declared winner. Quite a lot has happened, and it has been both exciting and disappointing too.

We shouldn't get too excited when these guys come out claiming to be into crypto. Rather, we should prepare our minds for anything their involvement might bring. Definitely, there will be increased adoption and some other things we can't figure out yet.

[Swordsoffreedom]

Don't enjoy this early yet, I feel uncomfortable when politicians get involved with Bitcoin.

First this is politics and its dirty, many politicians are too good to be true in their promise during the election but after they win it seems they have forgotten what promised they laid during their campaign.
Second, if the government is into Bitcoin heavily, should we worry about Bitcoin decentralization?  We know centralized authority does do not goes well with decentralized structure.

For now, i won't celebrate yet, and observe what would this politician do with Bitcoin and their promises if they won the election.

There is a big difference between now and many years ago, bitcoin has become more popular, many countries, organizations, and companies are investing in bitcoin...that signals bitcoin is inevitable. So even if politicians don't like BTC and just pretend, they still have to accept it if they don't want their country to become backward. That is why even countries hostile to bitcoin like Pakistan are slowly changing their stance.

We don't need to worry about anything, because basically, whether we like it or not, we can't stop the government. The only thing we can do is accept whatever happens and adapt.

[henry_of_skalitz]

Less crypto happy politicians isn't good the more we've got it's better. If there's one or two crypto friendly politicians it doesn't help crypto's cause but if there's more politicians who promote crypto it's going to help.

Surely, the more, the better, because fewer people would try to limit crypto and regulate it to the brim (though it still will happen eventually).

[Mate2237]

I think that this is a testament to how much bitcoin has grown that not only your average citizens know and use bitcoin but also presidents. Bitcoin mass adaption might come a lot sooner than everyone initially thought.

Yea, Bitcoin has indeed grown so much that the fear of strict government regulations is gradually fading away. The political leaders coming in now seem to be more enlightened and more accommodating of the whole crypto idea, including the likes of Donald Trump, who was way too strict during his first tenure.

On second thought, their sudden interest brings me to ask: why the sudden interest by politicians, especially those seeking political positions during elections? Are they just being politicians who have found a better way to market themselves, knowing fully well that this is the new trend?

With their interest and involvement, I also show concern that these pro-Bitcoin presidents might try to make Bitcoin a bit centralized by introducing regulations that could give them partial control. There are both advantages and disadvantages to having pro-Bitcoin presidents.

That's a fair point. There's no denying that Bitcoin's visibility has skyrocketed. The fact that even politicians are jumping on the crypto bandwagon speaks volumes. But it’s a bit fishy, right? Their sudden interest during election seasons raises eyebrows. Sounds like a marketing strategy to appeal to a younger and tech-savvy crowd.

While I appreciate that some leaders might actually understand crypto, we must remember that they also like to exert control. The last thing we need is more regulations that centralize Bitcoin. It's all about finding the balance. Maybe they're genuinely interested, or maybe they see an opportunity.

Whatever we are going to say now is mere assumption from our own end. We can only hope and pray that the policies these presidents who claim to be pro-Bitcoin will make are favourable to us all, as we cannot really do anything. Here we are still observing Trump's tenure and how it has affected the market over the past few months since he was declared winner. Quite a lot has happened, and it has been both exciting and disappointing too.

We shouldn't get too excited when these guys come out claiming to be into crypto. Rather, we should prepare our minds for anything their involvement might bring. Definitely, there will be increased adoption and some other things we can't figure out yet.

True we should not be too overwhelmed and joyful without looking at it from another point of view because these people could be playing politics with the mindset of the public standards since Bitcoin is one that that has followership supporting it will be getting sympathy from the Bitcoin followers and that means getting votes from the masses.


We should wait for these president to come up with his proposed plan concerning Bitcoin in the country before jumping to conclusions because currently in the United States we are hearing rumors about trump and must having some differences but before Trump second tenure elections these two people where the best of friends but now politics has step in

[Cookdata]

Back then, we only had Bukele (president of El salvador) as the national leader that was actively and loudly pushing for crypto adaption. Then Trump followed and now we have so many candidates for presidency and already presidents pushing for bitcoin. I think that this is a testament to how much bitcoin has grown that not only your average citizens know and use bitcoin but also presidents. Bitcoin mass adaption might come a lot sooner than everyone initially thought.

I'm going to be one of the spoiler alert on this El Salvador Bitcoin influence. Bukele did aloy I must say and I was really impressed with his mandate trying to make everyone use Bitcoin but people were all in for the money, they all sold their airdrop Bitcoin and the wallet were abandoned like no airdrop ever happened, in fact Bitcoin dump that very day the airdrop was sent out, people were really after the money the can spend immediately than holding it.

Trump gave us another meme coin instead of making Bitcoin a personal investment, like how it was going to look like if he made Bitcoin as part of US investment but who knows it's for the best for making Bitcoin his normal talk and never involved it with his politics, the tarrif war has seen enough and the impact on the Bitcoin price. These men just have one thing in common, and that's how it's going to favour's them, they don't really care like the way an ordinary claim to be.

[arabspaceship123]

There aren't enough crypto friendly presidents we need more because it's true the more the better. It's better with more. If we're getting more presidents who're crypto ppl we don't know how the world's going to be for our kids & future gens.

Less crypto happy politicians isn't good the more we've got it's better. If there's one or two crypto friendly politicians it doesn't help crypto's cause but if there's more politicians who promote crypto it's going to help.

Surely, the more, the better, because fewer people would try to limit crypto and regulate it to the brim (though it still will happen eventually).

[Inwestour]

True we should not be too overwhelmed and joyful without looking at it from another point of view because these people could be playing politics with the mindset of the public standards since Bitcoin is one that that has followership supporting it will be getting sympathy from the Bitcoin followers and that means getting votes from the masses.


We should wait for these president to come up with his proposed plan concerning Bitcoin in the country before jumping to conclusions because currently in the United States we are hearing rumors about trump and must having some differences but before Trump second tenure elections these two people where the best of friends but now politics has step in

I think it does not really matter for Bitcoin who the President of the United States is or who their friends are. If you look at previous cycles, Bitcoin always grew during the toughest times when people called it a scam and a bubble. It went through all the bear markets and still came out into a bull run. Sure, right now there is a bit of positive sentiment because Trump seems to be more loyal to Bitcoin, but in reality, he has not done anything major for Bitcoin.

He signed an order about a Bitcoin reserve, and that is where it ended. The United States is not actually buying Bitcoin or adding to any reserve. And yet, Bitcoin keeps growing and setting new all time highs. So Bitcoin simply goes through its own cycles regardless of the political situation in any country.

[FortuneFollower]

There aren't enough crypto friendly presidents we need more because it's true the more the better. It's better with more. If we're getting more presidents who're crypto ppl we don't know how the world's going to be for our kids & future gens.

That would be looking too far ahead of ourselves, - we need to remember that politicians are the masters of words, sweet or not.

But, yeah, the trend of people becoming more friendly to crypto on a higher level is truly there.

[arabspaceship123]

Presidents & leaders can change the course of crypto history because they're making laws. If they want crypto to be used like serious currencies they're going to make laws which help ppl trade crypto with out facing problems.

That would be looking too far ahead of ourselves, - we need to remember that politicians are the masters of words, sweet or not.

But, yeah, the trend of people becoming more friendly to crypto on a higher level is truly there.

[madnessteat]

There aren't enough crypto friendly presidents we need more because it's true the more the better. It's better with more. If we're getting more presidents who're crypto ppl we don't know how the world's going to be for our kids & future gens.

That would be looking too far ahead of ourselves, - we need to remember that politicians are the masters of words, sweet or not.

But, yeah, the trend of people becoming more friendly to crypto on a higher level is truly there.

Many people who wanted to use Bitcoin have been using it in their daily lives for a long time, regardless of the status of this asset in their jurisdiction. We have all seen how presidential candidates in different countries attract voters with completely different promises during election campaigns. Many promises are not fulfilled, so I would not advise trusting people who seek power, as many of them act in their own interests rather than those of the people who elect them.

[lionheart78]

I think that this is a testament to how much bitcoin has grown that not only your average citizens know and use bitcoin but also presidents. Bitcoin mass adaption might come a lot sooner than everyone initially thought.

Yea, Bitcoin has indeed grown so much that the fear of strict government regulations is gradually fading away. The political leaders coming in now seem to be more enlightened and more accommodating of the whole crypto idea, including the likes of Donald Trump, who was way too strict during his first tenure.

I hope these political people who are running for the leadership are really enlighten and not see Bitcoin as stepping stone to be elected.

On second thought, their sudden interest brings me to ask: why the sudden interest by politicians, especially those seeking political positions during elections? Are they just being politicians who have found a better way to market themselves, knowing fully well that this is the new trend?

Obviously they have seen what happened to President Trump when he supported Bitcoin in his campaign.  It is possible that a politician who is running for a seat in the government thinks that involving crypto community and having a friendly stance towards it would cater to larger support.

With their interest and involvement, I also show concern that these pro-Bitcoin presidents might try to make Bitcoin a bit centralized by introducing regulations that could give them partial control. There are both advantages and disadvantages to having pro-Bitcoin presidents.

It is highly possible that regulation will be implemented to third party crypto process and exchanges.  They might implement a mandatory KYC for Bitcoin users on these platform.

[GigaBit]

Back then, we only had Bukele (president of El salvador) as the national leader that was actively and loudly pushing for crypto adaption. Then Trump followed and now we have so many candidates for presidency and already presidents pushing for bitcoin. I think that this is a testament to how much bitcoin has grown that not only your average citizens know and use bitcoin but also presidents. Bitcoin mass adaption might come a lot sooner than everyone initially thought.

A country needs a good leader for its development who can predict the future and lead the country accordingly. In this era of technology, those who can easily adopt themselves will be ahead from others. And those who delay in taking decisions will see the success of others. We have already seen the interest of several presidents in Bitcoin. Not only ordinary people but also big leaders of the world are now thinking about saving Bitcoin at the national level. There is a great possibility that the demand for Bitcoin will increase several times in the next few years. Despite various adversities, the President of El Salvador took the decision to invest in Bitcoin and today he is seeing the success of that investment. Many more are now following him, which is why a competition to reserve Bitcoin may also be created among the presidents of various countries.

[FortuneFollower]

Many people who wanted to use Bitcoin have been using it in their daily lives for a long time, regardless of the status of this asset in their jurisdiction. We have all seen how presidential candidates in different countries attract voters with completely different promises during election campaigns. Many promises are not fulfilled, so I would not advise trusting people who seek power, as many of them act in their own interests rather than those of the people who elect them.

Yep.

You either don't look at news feed and buzz about it and use BTC anyways, or you are too attached to the opinions presented to you..